UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Nov > Nov 16

Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

From: Jim Speiser <jimspeiser.nul>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 22:17:21 -0700
Archived: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 05:53:55 -0500
Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:11:58 EST
>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:21:32 EST
>>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002


>>Or that bright meteors, a significant known cause of many IFOs
>>over the past 55 years, are less likely to have been the cause?

>Do you ever notice that when a witness steps forward and says I
>saw a "meteor" the skeptibunkers are silent, generally yawn and
>don't question the account, the witness's story, background, or
>anything else.

>Yet if a witness steps forward and says I saw a UFO, these same
>skeptibunkers would be all over the account, questioning it,
>denouncing it, proclaiming various and sundry explanations and
>so forth.

I think we've been down this road before. It's not in their job
description to question meteor sightings. That's for someone
like S.E.A.N. or whatever.

If I were to tell you I saw the mayor of Glendale yesterday, you
would yawn and go silent. If I told you I saw Elvis yesterday,
you'd be questioning it, denouncing it, etc.

Now I don't for a second compare Elvis sightings to UFO
sightings. But my point is that they (the skeptibunkers) do. So
their reactions are perfectly understandable, within the context
of their own perspectives. Their perspective may be wrong, but
their reaction within that perspective is correct.


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com