UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Nov > Nov 16

Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

From: Jim Speiser <jimspeiser.nul>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 21:44:17 -0700
Archived: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 05:52:39 -0500
Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002


>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:21:32 EST
>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:59:55 EST
>>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>>From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:20:52 +0000
>>>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>>>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2.nul>
>>>>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:48:03 EST
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

<snip>

>>If the explanation is an absolute embarrasement,

>Yeah, like the probability that these were flying saucers which
>reversed their direction instantly at hundreds or thousands of
>miles per hour without violating the laws of physics _is not an
>embarrassment?

>Or that bright meteors, a significant known cause of many IFOs
>over the past 55 years, are less likely to have been the cause?

I have to ask, which is more likely to be able to violate the
laws of physics (as we know them), a meteor, or a product of an
advanced technology?

Just asking...

==JJS==


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com