UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Nov > Nov 14

Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:59:55 EST
Archived: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:05:06 -0500
Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002


>From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 16:20:52 +0000
>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:48:03 EST
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>>From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:32:31 +0000
>>>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>>>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2.nul>
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 13:19:42 EST
>>>>Subject: Re: Filer's Files #45 - 2002

>>>>I believe that Dave Clarke called our attention recently to
>>>>pilot's reports of reentering space debris where they thought
>>>>dimming as meteor debris burned out is a possible explanation to
>>>>the famous 1952 Nash-Fortenberry saucer "formation" case.

>>>A truly breathtaking observation! Meteors that fly in formation

>>Dick:

>>Lots of pixs of these, see the front cover and Plate 3b of Uncle
>>Phil's excellent reference, UFOs Explained (Random House, 1974)

>>>_below_ an airliner,

>>They were always seen against the sky

>>>make a sharp angle turn, reverse direction,
>>>and fly away out of sight over the visible horizon.

>>No, seemed to move away because they were burning out. The
>>giveaway was that they blinked out _randomly_, not in order of
>>their "formation", because the sizes of the debris were random.

>>>Guess we better start spending zillions of dollars to investigate
>>>such "intelligent meteors.

>>Yup, you could. The only thing intelligent about this meteor was
>>that the witnesses of its 10-12 second flight (intererrupted
>>when the pilot moved around in the cockpit) sat down afterward
>>and tried to reconstruct what they assumed had happened near
>>Wallops Island test range.


>Bob,

>Are you now into falsifying data to force-fit your (erroneous)
>conclusions? You have the facts all wrong on this case. The
>glowing red disc-shaped objects flew underneath the airliner
>anfd made a sharp reversal of direction; the pilots were looking
>down and saw the objects against the ground.

>Your other "facts" are equally wrong as to location and other
>details. Good God, at least get the facts right!

Hmmm,

It appears facts don't matter, as long as it can be tied to some
non-ET explanation... no matter how much of a stretch of reality
it takes.

If the explanation is an absolute embarrasement, then we fall
back to the theory that someday, some time, at some point, some
non-ET explanation will come forth.


Cheers,

Robert


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com