UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Nov > Nov 14

Re: Disclosure Witnesses & Credibility

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 21:34:08 -0400
Archived: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:02:12 -0500
Subject: Re: Disclosure Witnesses & Credibility


>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 12:44:57 EST
>Subject: Re: Disclosure Witnesses & Credibility

>>From: Edward Case <sloweddy.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 03:10:50 -0800 (PST)
>>Subject: Re: Disclosure Witnesses & Credibility

>>[Non-Subscriber Post--ebk]

>>From: Edward Case
>>For:Submission to the UFO Mailing List

>>>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:34:44 -0400
>>>Subject: Disclosure Witnesses & Credibility

>>>I've noted much about Dr. Greer on this and other Lists. Most
>>>agree that Greer himself leaves something to be desired where
>>>credibility is concerned. However what concerns me is the
>>>possibility that the baby might be being thrown out with the
>>>bathwater.

>>>What is the concensus on this List regarding the quality of the
>>>disclosures by those witnesses that appeared during Greer's
>>>Disclosure Project?

>>>Has anyone broken down the presenters into groups as to the
>>>credibility of their disclosures?

>>>Is there a list of these presenters and their topics, somewhere?

>>You have raised a very important point. I think it is critical
>>that people who are interested in the truth about UFOs take a
>>good look at the credibility of the Disclosure Project
>>witnesses. Some of them may be unreliable - but the most
>>important question is: "are any of them telliing the truth, and
>>if so, who?".

>I always hesitate to enter into these discussions because of the
>hate email that always seems to follow, but these issues are
>important and if we are ever going to get to the bottom of the
>issue, then a house cleaning is in order.


Kevin, Edward and John V.,

Kevin mentioned the tainting of the Disclosure process by
questionable practices and testimony of some of the witnesses.

John mentioned Kevin's offer to vet the witnesses before the
whole affair began, a wise suggestion in any event.

Kevin, in his last email, has already mentioned some of the
obvious 'offenders' and I'm sure that there are more.

There are those on this List who, no doubt, have the same
concerns about other witnesses. Chances are we could boil the
list down to a 'precious few' - the nuggests.

This is not critical, but one likes to know what resources are
out there to draw on in the future.

It's been 10 years and I'm still catching up.

With interest,


Don Ledger

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com