UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Nov > Nov 7

Re: NASA Commissions Book To Prove Moon Landing

From: Jim Speiser <jimspeiser.nul>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 16:42:17 -0700
Archived: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:41:20 -0400
Subject: Re: NASA Commissions Book To Prove Moon Landing

>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 13:15:28 -0500
>Subject: Re: NASA Commissions Book To Prove Moon Landing

>>From: Colin Bennett <sharkley.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 00:29:32 -0000
>>Subject: NASA Commissions Book To Prove Moon Landing

>>>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 10:28:05 EST
>>>Subject: Re: NASA Commissions Book To Prove Moon Landing

>>>>From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 22:37:38 +0000
>>>>Subject: Re: NASA Commissions Book To Prove Moon Landing

>>>Tell me Colin: do you believe that the U.S. actually sent astronauts
>>>to the Moon or not? On which side of reality do you sit?

>>>>Of course the notion that the Moon landings were faked is right up
>>>>there with the Flat Earth and Hollow Earth nonsense.

>>Hi Bob, Dick, and all good List folk,

>>The question asked by Bob is like the question have you stopped
>>beating your wife lately - answer yes or no. That is a leading
>>question, and is hardly applicable in any court. These hard
>>differentiations Bob prefers for his version of the real are
>>largely meaningless in a postmodern age where science is
>>evolving into a huge cyberspace gaming system rather than being
>>in pursuit of the old industrial idea of objective tangible
>>goals. But then there are still people around who believe that
>>the world of appearances is totally real:

>>they believe that doctors cure, policemen protect, politicians
>>govern, scientists discover things, and priests leads us to God.
>>Like the skeptics versus believers game, those who oppose the
>>original moon landing split into hot and cool parts. The hot
>>believe that the scientists and astronauts were on a Hollywood
>>set, but I propose a more sophisticated approach based on the
>>question do the scientists themselves consider that it was real?
>>They used screens to carve images in one another's head, as did

>>This making of images is a continuous process industry like the
>>production of cement, or soap operas, both almost

>>And of course there is no OFF switch.

>Fortunately, there is a delete "switch" so I have removed a lot
>of this 'monotribe' or 'word salad' to get to the hard core of
>'fact'.- according to Colin.

>>Through intense mystical subjectivities we
>>enter truth, not through facts. If facts exist, I certainly have
>>not come across one.

>A delusionary or pseudo - solipsist?

>"I think, therefore, I am!"

>..... I think.

>(But maybe I'm wrong....)"

>At any rate, my 'self' is the only thing that exists. All else
>is a 'dream'.


Whew! Thanks, Bruce, I was wondering if I was the only one
whose eyes got crossed reading this. Sounds like what you'd
get if Marshall McLuhan and Robert A. Wilson were locked in
a closet together for nine months....


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com