UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Nov > Nov 7

Re: MOGUL Mangled Math

From: David Rudiak <DRudiak.nul>
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:34:25 -0800
Archived: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 12:33:54 -0400
Subject: Re: MOGUL Mangled Math

>From: Dave Morton <Marspyrs.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 14:45:53 EST
>Subject: Re: MOGUL Mangled Math - Morton

>>From: Tim Printy <TPrinty.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 20:08:10 EST
>>Subject: Re: MOGUL Mangled Math - Printy

>>>From: Brad Sparks <removedbyrequest>>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 05:41:06 EST
>>>Subject: Re: MOGUL Mangled Math - Sparks

>>Hmmm... I am not sure what you mean by Printy's map. I
>>apparently used the same maps as you. That is, the maps
>>published in Pflock's book, the Moore/Saler/ Ziegler book, and
>>the 1994 USAF report. Are there others that I am not aware of?
>>Perhaps you can present them for us to examine. Otherwise, my
>>values are not invalid or irrelevant until you can show that
>>they are. Is this rebuttal by declaration? Are you suggesting
>>that Rudiak's 31 miles is "phony" as well since it disagrees
>>with your 34 miles?

>Could someone just scan the maps, label them (title, author(s),
>date, page, figure number), and throw them up on a website?
>Remind us again where we're measuring "from" and "to"... Then we
>can all print them and take out our rulers and measure. I would
>think that measuring within a few tenths of a mile would be
>close enough for this issue...

>Dave Morton


I've already done this on my Web site:


Printy is trying, as usual, is trying to take the discussion off
on a tangent.

The real subject is Moore clearly changing the original Flight
#5 graphic, misplotting the crash site as well as making other
changes, such as removing Roswell base from the map.

Printy is trying to divert this into a discussion of whether
Brad Sparks accurately measured Moore's misplotted crash site,
which is hardly the point.

It's the classic slimy lawyer "Plan B" defense, made famous by
the TV show 'The Practice'. When guilt of your client is
overwhelming, attack the prosecution witness and accuse them of
the crime. The whole point is to confuse the jury.

David Rudiak

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com