UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Nov > Nov 3

Scientists Debate Intelligent Extraterrestrial Life

From: Stig Agermose <stig.agermose.nul>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 20:39:13 +0100
Archived: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 10:32:04 -0400
Subject: Scientists Debate Intelligent Extraterrestrial Life


Source: The Boston Globe

http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/307/focus/Lonely_planet+.shtml

Stig

***

Scientists debate the existence of intelligent life beyond
Cambridge

By Jascha Hoffman, 11/3/2002

**

THERE ARE ABOUT 100 billion galaxies in the observable universe,
each with hundreds of billions of stars. What are the chances
that there's any interesting life out there?

In 1961, astronomer Frank Drake proposed a simple answer: We can
assume that some stars have planets, some planets host single-
celled life forms, some of those life forms survive to develop
intelligence, and some intelligent beings leave an
electromagnetic trace before they expire.

Carl Sagan once estimated that in the Milky Way alone there must
be over a million detectable civilizations. Today, Drake sticks
to his original estimate of 10,000.

Peter Ward is sick of these loose overestimates. "You can't turn
on the TV without seeing aliens," the co-author of "Rare Earth:
Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe" (Copernicus Books,
2000) complained to a Cambridge auditorium packed with
astronomers, UFO enthusiasts, and other onlookers last week.
Ward was facing off against Harvard paleontologist Charles
Marshall at a debate hosted by the Harvard-Smithsonian Center
for Astrophysics. In 1996, Ward and Marshall worked together on
a paper arguing that a major drop in sea level, in addition to
the infamous asteroid, had wiped out the dinosaurs. But when it
comes to the distribution of intelligent life in the universe,
they couldn't agree less.

"Maybe I shouldn't count myself as intelligent life," quipped
Ward, a professor of geology at the University of Washington.
"The first stop on my book tour was a science fiction
convention. A little girl told me I was the devil for taking the
aliens away." The Australia-born Marshall, for his part, retains
the taste for discovery that propelled him from childhood dino-
mania to a career in evolutionary biology. "Life is capable of
more trajectories than physics or astronomy might predict," he
said. "I don't know if life is teeming out there. But it could
be."

Ward and Marshall agree that the universe is full of microbes.
Recent studies have shown that interstellar clouds can generate
amino acids, the building blocks of proteins. Meteors falling to
earth usually contain a variety of organic compounds. And cells
can survive under extremes of temperature, pressure, and pH, and
may be able to travel from planet to planet on comets.

But to flourish, even simple life needs liquid water, and this
limits it to planets in the habitable zone: far enough from a
star not to be boiling, but close enough not to be freezing. And
to get complex life - anything more intricate than a flatworm -
 it seems that you need, first of all, a decent atmosphere.

Here on Earth, it took 3 billion years of steady temperatures to
build up enough oxygen to support animals. The fact that our
planet lies in a habitable zone does not itself guarantee such
steadiness. Ward thinks that plate tectonics also do us a great
service: When one plate slides under another, an updraft of
magma brings carbon dioxide to the surface, eventually warming
up the atmosphere through the greenhouse effect. But once the
atmosphere gets warmer, excess carbon dioxide is removed by the
calcium in the magma, and it gets cooler again. "For billions of
years, we've been bouncing around in a very fine temperature
range because of the thermostat of plate tectonics," he said.
"How common is that in the universe? We don't know."

To survive long enough to evolve any complexity, Ward went on,
life must also avoid being destroyed by space debris. Earth is
shielded by Jupiter's gravitational field, which slows down
incoming comets. But in most solar systems, a Jupiter-sized
planet has such an erratic orbit that it will eventually fling
any nearby planet away from the star. We may be uniquely lucky
to live in such a safe neighborhood.

Marshall is unimpressed by scenarios that emphasize life's
fragility. "The question is, how hard is it to sterilize a
planet?" he asked. In the total devastation following the Mount
Saint Helens eruption, biologists were staggered to find plants
protected by animals that fell on them. Even at Hiroshima, a few
people survived at close range to the explosion. "We should
expect such surprises," said Marshall. "Life will find a way."

Life also makes its own way. Take the Cambrian explosion of 445
million years ago, when a host of scuttling sea creatures burst
into a world that hadn't seen much more than worms. What
accounts for such rapid evolutionary change? "If you have a
bunch of plant life, and someone is able to develop a few genes
for jaws, then everyone had better watch out," said Marshall.
It's no surprise that eyes and legs, crucial for hiding from
predators, appeared at the same time. "With an increase in
selective pressures, complexity is bound to arise. You don't
need special conditions."

But Peter Ward was not convinced. "If complexity is inevitable,
then what was going on for the three billion years between the
first cell and the Cambrian explosion?" Just a slow and steady
buildup of oxygen due to the presence of simple life-forms and
liquid water. "Without the thermostat of plate tectonics, the
right conditions just don't last very long," he said.

Of course, there may be more to life than what we can guess now.
"We have some idea of what conditions were necessary for us to
evolve," Marshall said, "but we don't know if they're the only
possible ones." While Ward prefers to limit the discussion to
life as we know it - carbon-based organisms with DNA - Marshall
thinks we should expect the unexpected.

Some audience members found this approach a bit too vague. "One
data point is better than none," one said. "Can you quantify the
problem?"

Many scientists are working on it. Astrobiology, defined broadly
as the study of life in the universe, is now serious science.
NASA and the National Science Foundation invest tens of millions
of dollars every year in it. Astronomers search for new planets,
geologists prospect for evidence of water on already known
planets, and biochemists piece together the origins of life on
earth. Still, it's mostly theory for now. And hitchhiking to the
nearest star still takes 300,000 years.

"The fact that neither of us has any numbers, shows that we're
going on next to nothing," said Marshall. "But my sense of faith
is that the universe is so unimaginably rich that it will turn
out that life is common, and that scientific reasoning, while
powerful, can lock us into a narrow view of what is possible."

**

Jascha Hoffman is a writer based in Boston

This story ran on page D1 of the Boston Globe on 11/3/2002.
=A9 Copyright 2002 Globe Newspaper Company.


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com