UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jun > Jun 28

Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy - Young

From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 11:57:57 EDT
Fwd Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:22:28 -0400
Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy - Young


 >From: David Rudiak <DRudiak@earthlink.net>
 >To: <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:03:42 -0700
 >Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy

 >>From: Bruce Hutchinson <bhutch@grassyhill.com>
 >>Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 12:31:06 -500
 >>Fwd Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:48:28 -0400
 >>Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy - Hutchinson

<snip>

 >However, Moore does note that if he changed just one of his
 >assumptions, the balloon could also have ended up about 150
 >miles away:

 >(p. 93) "If the balloons had not entered the stratosphere but
 >had continued in the upper troposphere, _they would have passed
 >17 miles south of the actual landing site and would have landed
 >more than 150 miles to the east at the end of the [assumed] 343-
 >minute flight."

 >That would have put Flight 4 somewhere in southwest Kansas, not
 >the Foster ranch. Where did you get the idea that Moore's
 >analysis somehow proved that the balloons came down within 17
 >miles of the ranch?


Hi David, Bruce:

David goes on and on and on about his variables, assumptions,
mentions neightboring states, if this and that had been different.

The problem with all of this is that no balloon train debris were
found in Kansas, but something very similar was found on the
Foster Ranch.


Ta, ta...

Clear skies,

Bob Young




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com