UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jun > Jun 28

Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy - Hutchinson

From: Bruce Hutchinson <bhutch@grassyhill.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 00:00:53 -500
Fwd Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:20:39 -0400
Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy - Hutchinson


 >From: Bruce Hutchinson <bhutch@grassyhill.com>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 12:31:06 -500
 >Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy

 >>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254@aol.com>
 >>To: ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net
 >>Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:00:08 EDT
 >>Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy

List and Readers;

 >>Moore came along a few years ago and ran an analysis based on
 >>data obtained from the weather service about upper level wind
 >>currents back in 1947. Based upon that analysis Moore was able
 >>to get the alleged balloon/instrument package to approx 17 miles
 >>of the ranch. Now I would point out that apparently nobody
 >>independent of Moore has run an analysis of the same data, i.e.
 >>upper air currents, payload etc etc.

 >This is correct... but note that the analysis of Moore's puts
 >flight #4 _within_ 17 miles, _not_ 17 miles "short"!

Oops! Not quite correct.....

Moore's recollections were that flight 4 was _tracked_ to within
17 miles of the impact site. Moore's prediction of the flight
path and descent, done years later based on weather service
data, placed the impact "in the vicinity" of the actual site,
and much closer than the "17 miles" we have been bandying about.

As a side note; the orientation of the debris field predicted by
Moore matches Marcel's original description.


Regards,

Bruce Hutchinson




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com