UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jun > Jun 25

Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy - Gates

From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:00:28 EDT
Fwd Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:58:46 -0400
Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy - Gates


 >From: Robert Gates <RGates8254@aol.com>
 >To: ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net
 >Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:55:36 EDT
 >Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy

 >>From: Bruce Hutchinson <bhutch@grassyhill.com>
 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >>Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 13:51:04 -500
 >>Subject: Re: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy

 >>>From: Mac Tonnies <macbot@yahoo.com>
 >>>To: UFO UpDates <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >>>Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 18:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
 >>>Subject: Roswell 'Hieroglyph' Controversy

 ><snip>

 >Shouldn't, anytime anybody says the NYU Rawin balloon, it be
 >pointed out that the very closest, in theory, that the so called
 >expert could get the balloon to the debris field is 17 or so
 >miles?

 >So no matter what, the theory is still 17 miles short... kind of
 >like horse shoes and hand gernades..... :) >>

Gentlemen:

Isn't what happened that at 17 miles the balloon device dropped
to an altitude that caused it to disappear from the radar set
which was tracking it from White Sands, or wherever?

Just because it was no long visible from the radar receiver
doesn't mean that it wasn't just poking along.


Clear skies,

Bob Young




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com