UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jun > Jun 18

Re: Blimps - Lehmberg

From: Alfred Lehmberg <Lehmberg@snowhill.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:56:45 -0500
Fwd Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 17:18:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Blimps - Lehmberg


 >From: Paul Novak <nib68@yahoo.com>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 16:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
 >Subject: Re: Blimps

 >>From: Alfred Lehmberg <Lehmberg@snowhill.com>
 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >>Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:02:55 -0500
 >>Subject: Re: Blimps

 >>"Assuming these objects over Los Angeles in 1942 were Japanese
 >>Terror Blimps (JTBs), where did they get the non-flammable
 >>helium necessary to keep them in the air?"

 >Japan did have the ability to send aloft lighter than air
craft.

That was not the issue, Mr. Novak. Nowhere was it remotely
intimated by me that they did not. That they did not likely have
easy access to helium and so provide for balloons that would
not, readily, explode, was.

 >However, there is no basis to assume a Japanese blimp was
 >responsible for the incident.

None, sir.

 >A blimp quite obviously would not
 >have lasted very long.

Is this to suggest that, perhaps, something did?

 >No blimps were sighted and the only
 >mentions of any are sheer speculation.

...speculations warmly embraced by the least ufologically
endowed, I might add.

 >Also, it is not at all
 >proven there was indeed any object for shells to explode against
 >and much reason to believe there was not.

...Nothing ever is, really (proven that is), but I have rational
suspicions regarding the lack of availability of that same
proof. The dearth of forthcoming information from government
institutions obsessed by obsessive and questionable secrecies
speaks very well to this, I submit. Be that as it may, I think
there is plenty to indicate that there is much that falls to the
side of something pretty damed peculiar happening over LA in
1942, and that the garden variety relfex of skeptibunky denial
does BEGIN to reflect or qualify it.

 >However, Japan did use balloon bombs called Fugos. They were
 >fueled with hydrogen, not helium, and carried antipersonel and
 >incendiary bombs.

A point not germane to the discussion, but distractingly true
none-the-less; no point here.

Lehmberg@snowhill.com
  ~~=D6~~
EXPLORE "Alfred Lehmberg's Alien View" at his VSN URL.
http://www.alienview.net


JOHN FORD RESTORATION FUND -- John will be released eventually.
He'll need a tax free cash stake to get on his feet. Let's put
one together for him; the bigger it is -- the more attention he
gets. It could have been you. E-mail for detail. $350.00 pledged
-- $200.00 collected!

"I cleave the heavens, and soar to the infinite.
What others see from afar, I leave far behind me."
- Giordano Bruno, scourged by the scabrously specious scurrilous.



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com