UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jun > Jun 17

Re: Request For Investigative & Remedial

From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 11:21:23 -0400
Fwd Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:32:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Request For Investigative & Remedial


 >From: Steven Kaeser <steve@konsulting.com>
 >To: <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >Subject: Re: Request For Investigative & Remedial Intervention
 >Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 20:27:51 -0400

 >>From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic@verizon.net>
 >>To: ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net
 >>Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:11:09 -0400
 >>Subject: Re: Request For Investigative & Remedial Intervention

 ><snip>

 >>First... Dick Hall has posted _several_ excellent proposals for
 >>a UFOlogical 'oversight' board or panel that have all been
 >>uniformly ignored. A good place to start might be to go back in
 >>the UpDates archives, dig up Dick Halls' proposals, and maybe
 >>try to 'fine tune' and hopefully implement one of them. No need
 >>to reinvent the wheel. Dick Halls' proposals are a great head
 >>start on an already difficult task.

 >However, it was Richard's hard line approach to Ufology that
 >caused him to sever his involvement in the MUFON Journal. Much
 >of this field is driven by the profit motive or faith, and not
 >the pursuit of scientific integrity (which we probably couldn't
 >agree on anyway).

 >Bruce Hutchison wrote:

 >>>It would be interesting though, if all published reports - books,
 >>>articles, magazines, and even (...gasp!) TV 'documentaries'

 >John Responded:

 >>Oh don't be such a snob, Bruce. Where else can the average
 >>person get to see and hear the Mantell family? (For instance)
 >>When hunting for information, _any_ source is a good one. TV
 >>_can_ be every bit as useful and valuable for gleaning
 >>information as print or any other media.

 >Of course the information you receive from that source is
 >filtered by a director and producer, who often make decisions
 >that help to increase viewers (and thus profits). I don't view
 >television documentaries as worthless, because (as you point
 >out) there is often no other way for the public to become
 >exposed to the stories being told. But I view them with
 >reservations and understand that I'm likely getting the
 >producer's view of 'reality'.

Hi Steve,

You were going great up to here:

 >You may recall the NOVA program
 >on Alien Abductions, and many of those who took part felt (to
 >some degree) betrayed when it took a very skeptical stance.

Humor?

That was _me_ Steve! And we didn't feel "betrayed because they
took a skeptical stance." I'm fine with intellectually honest
skeptics. Always have been. My introduction onto this List six
years ago was because of the NOVA program where Budd first
presented my case to the public. As a result, EBK invited me to
participate in the ongoing discussion here at UpDates. But I
digress.

As many have repeatedly stated on this List (and I agree) there
is a difference between skepticism and debunkery. The NOVA
program was a poor attempt at 'debunking' the abduction phenom.
_That_ was, and always has been, my problem with it.

 >In the past, we've outlined goals that might help to lend
 >credibility to the field, but IMO there's little chance that you
 >could get two or three of us to agree on anything major. A
 >clear definition of the field, rules of evidence, and peer
 >review would help. But, they're unlikely at this point.

Thank you for restating my point. I agree. That is what I said
in the first place. But again, where else can the average person
sit back and listen to interviews with folks like the Mantell's?
Nothing in this world is 'all good' or 'all bad' for that
matter. TV programming included. I thought the Sightings segment
with the Mantell family was a _valuable_ broadcast document.
Regardless of how screwed up the rest of TV content may be. It
never pays to throw the baby out with the bath water. TV, as
with anything else, needs to be approached with a critical eye
and a modicum of discretion.   :)


Regards,

John Velez





[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com