From: Alfred Lehmberg <Lehmberg@snowhill.com> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:04:53 -0500 Fwd Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 19:24:53 -0400 Subject: Re: Illegitimacy of CSICOP - Lehmberg >From: Bruce Hutchinson <email@example.com> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:23:08 -500 >Subject: Re: Illegitimacy of CSICOP >>From: Wendy Connors <FadedDiscs@comcast.net> >>To: UFO Updates <UFOUpdates@virtuallystrange.net> >>Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 06:09:13 -0600 >>Subject: Re: Illegitimacy of CSICOP ><snip> >>BTW, Bob. I love the little kid type >>running to daddy you did. Cute. >Wendy >It is a shame that an investigator of your status feels she must >resort to petulant ad homium attacks like this. It only >denigrates your position, and quite frankly, creates the >impression that your position on CSICOP may be based more on >jealousy than a difference of opinion- no matter how polar those >opinions are. Stuff and nonsense, Mr. Hutchinson. Mr. Young thought he was going to get the big gun and use him in the fray of the debate. In as much as it pretty effectively backfired on him because Robert Sheaffer's aggregate argument was so weak he still has to pay the freight for invoking him. >Bob Young did nothing more than what is appropriate - seek out >the person you quoted and acquire from him a comment. More stuff and nonsense, Mr. Hutchinson. Mr. Young was deliberately insulting, did everything but call her a liar, and was _far_ from merely inquisitive about a comment that the commenter finally, although insipidly, admitted that he made! >You >scathingly rebuke skeptics/debunkers for not seeking out >sources. Bob does that, and gets from you in return a totally >unprofessional taunt. Still _more_ stuff and nonsense. Even _if_ unprofessional (which it was not) it was well deserved. Robert Sheaffer added _nothing_ to the debate but ad hominum of his own - or maybe you missed the comments regarding intelligence and competency. This is forgetting Mr. Young's production of same. Scrape the scales from _your_ eyes. >I do not know what your objectives are in this series, but if it >is to sway other's opinions about CSICOP and demonstrate your >professional qualifications as an investigator, your post set >those efforts back several notches. Stuff and nonsense to the last... She's _advanced_ her cause, engineered Robert Sheaffer out of his cloistered woodwork and into UpDates for debate, and put a little more illumination on an alleged and suspect 'bastion' of light -- CSICOP. We are _well_ served! Thank _YOU_, Ms. Conners! Lehmberg@snowhill.com ~~=D6~~ EXPLORE "Alfred Lehmberg's Alien View" at his VSN URL. http://www.alienview.net JOHN FORD RESTORATION FUND -- John will be released eventually. He'll need a tax free cash stake to get on his feet. Let's put one together for him; the bigger it is -- the more attention he gets. It could have been you. E-mail for detail. $350.00 pledged -- $200.00 collected! "I cleave the heavens, and soar to the infinite. What others see from afar, I leave far behind me." - Giordano Bruno, scourged by the scabrously specious scurrilous.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp