From: Alfred Lehmberg <Lehmberg@snowhill.com> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 18:09:21 -0500 Fwd Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 02:40:25 -0400 Subject: Re: Illegitimacy of CSICOP - Lehmberg >From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com> >Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:20:22 EDT >Subject: Re: Illegitimacy of CSICOP >To: firstname.lastname@example.org >>From: Wendy Connors <FadedDiscs@comcast.net> >>To: UFO Updates <UFOUpdates@virtuallystrange.net> >>Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 07:36:18 -0600 >>Subject: Illegitimacy of CSICOP >>The Illegitimacy of CSICOP: <snip> >Wendy: >Is there some curious reason that you do not provide any >citation for these quotes, including the date that they were >published? Translated <and don't insult yourself by saying I'm putting words in your mouth>: "Could you send the citations for these quotes, please." She's done it for me. One can learn to appreciate an honesty in the translation where your mocking request just drips with accusation, insult, and innuendo. "Curious reasons" (?) only in implication, Mr. Young. Yours. Empty asccusation, I add. Just asking for the citations would have given you _real_ ammunition if she didn't have them and avoidence of this embarrassment if she had. The way you did it just paints you as a corner shooter and a CSICOP stooge. + >>From the Collective Mind of the CSICOP Cult: >>"Our group is not what you would call a front line organization. >>We don't receive reports directly from the general public. We do >>not attempt to get a specific number of cases. Because we >>concentrate only on those cases that the other organizations >>have put out to be unexplainable." >>In other words CSICOP doesn't do first hand investigations. They >>only deal in personal opinion. CSICOP proclaims to be a >>scientific organization, but doesn't engage in actual science. >>CSICOP defaults on its own legitimacy. >Shaeffer (if these are indeed his words) ...she has yet to demonstrate any real (not imagined or implied) behavior to the contrary, Mr. Young, where your behavior speaks volumes. What artless insult. Were I her you can be assured you would hear from me. I'd parse you down real fine and see where you began and ended. Not a pretty process. Each of us would find out useful things about the other as we made our literary way. Also not a pretty process. Predictably, you're a little too quick to impugn. >said no such thing as >you imply. Oh wild blueberry blather-wa. He's said that and more in the exponential. Anyone with a scrape of objectivity knows what CSICOP is all about... denial, knee-jerk debunkery, and artless dismissal. >He clearly means that his group does not make the >initial investigations of these claims, but concentrates on >those which have been proposed as unexplained. >You have deliberately changed, "front line", into "first hand", >something which has an entirely different meaning. I'm going to forgive her that error, in that it is not to the detriment of her point, which is these gentlemen you defend so stealthily are hobbled by a HUGE, irrational, and cowardly bias that you, incidentally, are seemingly oblivious to. >After you changed Schaeffer's words into your own, you then >announced that these words mean that CSICOP, "only deal[s] in >personal opinion", and, "doesn't engage in actual science." Credible sources (always prepared to debate I might add) say that they (CSICOP) are the antithesis of science, are not scientific, and even impugn science, as you seemingly do. >I am curious as to what was going through your mind when you >did this? I think I know! It was a poignantly accurate realization that the covetous band of evil doers* she references has done more to keep us in the paranormal dark ages than any huckster, holist, or hoaxer they'd pretend to dismiss. ...Well, I'm going to go pop some corn and wait for Ms. C. to post her reply (if she doen't just blow you off completely). Can you say "smoking hole in the gut of your two-color CSICOP idealogy"? Lehmberg@snowhill.com *yeah... evil. Evil as any other clear hurdle to aggregate advancement. Clearly only a pretender of true science, what else could it be? ~~=D6~~ EXPLORE "Alfred Lehmberg's Alien View" at his VSN URL. http://www.alienview.net JOHN FORD RESTORATION FUND -- John will be released eventually. He'll need a tax free cash stake to get on his feet. Let's put one together for him; the bigger it is -- the more attention he gets. It could have been you. E-mail for detail. $350.00 pledged -- $200.00 collected! "I cleave the heavens, and soar to the infinite. What others see from afar, I leave far behind me." - Giordano Bruno, scourged by the scabrously specious scurrilous.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp