From: Bruce Maccabee <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 08:34:18 -0400 Fwd Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 10:58:29 -0400 Subject: Re: 'Media Not Covering-Up' - Maccabee >From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com> >To: email@example.com >Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 19:13:33 EDT >Subject: Re: 'Media Not Covering-Up' >>From: Bruce Maccabee <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >>Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:07:02 -0400 >>Subject: 'Media Not Covering-Up' >>A point should be, made here: don't mix up serious reporting >>with engtertainment. It's OK for the major or minor press to >>present UFO related stuff, including for example sightings by >>>Jan 5, 2001 in Ohio>> My error in date: should have written 2000 >Hi, Bruce: >It was Illinois, January 2000, and I wonder why did the police >department's own website say that it was an aircraft? MIBs? Probably use the same justification as the Air Force: a) it was in the air b) it was a craft a+b = aircraft (note they didn't say it was stars or planets - which, if I recall correctly, was the CSICOP/Klass explanation.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp