UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jun > Jun 1

Re: Possible Action Pending In Reed UFO Fraud -

From: Amy Hebert <yellowrose129@attbi.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 16:56:36 -0500
Fwd Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 19:45:16 -0400
Subject: Re: Possible Action Pending In Reed UFO Fraud -


 >From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
 >To: ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net
 >Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 09:48:44 EDT
 >Subject: Re: Possible Action Pending In Reed UFO Fraud

 >>From: Amy Hebert <yellowrose129@attbi.com>
 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >>Subject: Re: Possible Action Pending In Reed UFO Fraud - Hebert
 >>Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:38:28 -0500
 >><snip>
 >>Boycott the enablers.

 >Amy, List, All -

 >I have suggested for years that we do not participate in
 >programs and on venues in which those who have exploited UFOs
 >appear. I have no problem with sharing a stage with Stan
 >Friedman, for example, but balk at sharing it with say, a Don
 >Schmitt. Here is a guy who did a great deal of damage to the
 >Roswell UFO case and to the field. Yet, he still lectures and he
 >still investigates and people believe what he says.
<snip>

I couldn't agree with you more, Kevin, but it won't stop either
the hoaxers or the enablers. And if those with real research and
high quality information stop appearing simply because they don't
want to be on the same stage as trash, then all that will be left
is...trash.

 >I do like this idea of boycotting the enablers because this is
 >the way to eliminate the forum for them and get rid of their
 >opinions. I am not suggesting we boycott the forums of those who
 >disagree, only those who have muddied the waters of Ufology.
 >Refuse to appear with those people. Make it clear that you don't
 >want to have anything to do with them. And use, as a criterion,
 >their lies. Reed is a good example. Schmitt is a good example.
 >Mel Noel is a good example.

 >If we begin a self policing, maybe we can begin to move into the
 >arenas that matter.

My suggestion to boycott was really just wishful thinking. You
and I both know few people are able or willing to descriminate
between what may be fact and what may be fiction. As long as
there is an audience for junk media, it will survive and thrive.

This does not, however, mean we must give up. What I'd like to
see are more programs that focus on genuine research rather than
the usual mix of New Age-Spiritualism-UFO-Alien-poopourri. I'd
give my right...foot to attend a small, research oriented
conference in which only a few qualified researchers present
over a large, mixed bag, anyone-can-share conference.
Unfortunately, those who organize conferences (and TV, radio
programs) focus more on entertainment than on research and don't
seem to recognize the difference.


A. Hebert




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com