UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jun > Jun 1

Re: SDI 190 - 'Media Not Covering-Up' - Bowden

From: Dave Bowden <grafikfx@lineone.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 03:49:18 +0100
Fwd Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 09:18:26 -0400
Subject: Re: SDI 190 - 'Media Not Covering-Up' - Bowden

 >From: Eleanor White <raven1@mail.nas.net>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 07:22:34 +0000
 >Subject: Re: SDI 190 - 'Media Not Covering-Up'

 >>From: Dave Bowden <grafikfx@lineone.net>
 >>To: <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >>Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 00:40:47 +0100
 >>Subject: Re: SDI 190 - 'Media Not Covering-Up'

 >>I can understand your beef on this, but here's a thought, surely
 >>in the light of 9/11 a UFO seen over New York or Washington for
 >>instance would be of some media interest, judging by the
 >>heightened security.

 >>UFO items are not old news, just not happening news.

 >You know something? If asked informally and away from
 >the office, I'll bet 100% of media people who have rejected
 >UFO stories know quite well UFOs _are_ happening, but
 >are afraid to print any specific case because of fear the one
 >they would choose would turn out to be a hoax.

Unless I'm mistaken all UFO's that appear to be a 'nut's and
bolt's' spacecraft turn out to be hoaxes.
If you can offer video or film evidence on the contrary I'd like
to see it.

 >Perhaps a screening committee approach would help the media exec
 >have the confidence to print/air such a story?

Confidence requires evidence, they don't have the confidence
therefore.....

 >>The media are simply playing to the publics interest.

 >Since the general public never sees UFO news, any interest
 >is stifled before it can bloom. Polls show there is quite a bite
 >of interest by the public.

 >>For example:

 >>I have had it up to here (pointing to my forehead) about David
 >>Beckhams foot injury and whether he can play for England in the
 >>World cup.

 >>This (believe it or not) was the top story, above everything
 >>else that's been going on in the World.

 >>Blair could have given a moonie outside 10 Downing Street, it
 >>still would have played second fiddle to Beckhams foot. What
 >>chance would UFO news have.

 >>That's the way the cookie crumbles.

 >Doesn't have to be that way, but both UFO researchers and the
 >media need to grasp how effective _regular_, quality assured,
 >not splashy and not long, media items can be in motivating the
 >public. If this is done, there will be the necessary public
 >interest to press government to disclose what they know on
 >UFOs.

You mean something along the lines of:

"Dear Government,

Could you please tell us what these little blobs are we keep
seeing in our skies?

We haven't got a clue what they are but there's an awful lot of
speculation going around.

Any information would be greatly appreciated."


 >There is no reason to hide UFO information, is there?

Do you know the term knowledge is power?

Have you ever considered that maybe the Government don't
actually know what these things are?

For them to admit that would deminish them in some way.

All the time you keep putting them on the pedistal of all
knowledge they will always hold power over you.

 >Slow and steady gets the job done.

Small moves Ellie, small moves. ;-)


Dave Bowden




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com