UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jan > Jan 7

Re: New Year Agenda - Gates

From: Robert Gates <RGates8254@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 23:03:19 EST
Fwd Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 12:48:31 -0500
Subject: Re: New Year Agenda - Gates


 >Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 09:56:15 -0600
 >Subject: Re: New Year Agenda - Stacy
 >From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>

 >>Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2002 21:38:23 -0600
 >>Subject: Re: New Year Agenda
 >>From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>

 >>Maybe Friedman or Randle could weigh in here? The obvious answer
 >>would seem to be Gen. Lesley Grove and the Manhattan Project.
 >>But that could have been a case of personal fiat and project
 >>structure for all I know, not necessarily established operating
 >>policy.

 >>Dennis Stacy


 >List,

 >I found this, which is pretty interesting, by doing a Google
 >search using the words compartmentalization and need to know.

 >http://www.hanford.gov/docs/rl-97-1047/site_security/role.htm

 >It's a fairly good summary of those subjects, so some of you
 >might want to bookmark it or make a copy.

 >Dennis

That was a good article. It illustrates a point I attempted to make many
months ago.

That being, _if_ a group was working on a crashed saucer and
dead ET bodies, one group would be working only on say the
propulsion unit while another group would be working on the
medical (i.e. dead bodies) and perhaps another group would be
working on the controls and so forth. The groups would likely
have no knowledge of what the other group or groups had found
out, or what they were pursuing, they would only know what their
group was doing. Likewise each group would operate under a
different codeword, so they couldn't share any information, even
if they wanted to. It would also be likely that the group leader
would report to somebody higher up the vine, and the person or
members of our high level group higher up the vine may be the
only person(s) who knew the "complete picture."

Also we need to keep in mind that information classified at a
compartmentalized level, say TS/Codeword is _not_ shared at
briefings, meetings, or in written documents at a lower level of
classification such as Top Secret, or TS different codeword,
Secret or otherwise.

Vice President Harry Truman was not in the "need-to-know" loop.
A number of high level, high ranking people were not in the
"need-to-know" loop. As Groves put it "...each man should know
everything he needed to know to do his job and nothing else."

Today we can make the case that there are in fact high level,
compartmentalized projects that high ranking officials that many
people would presume/assume would "know about" are not in the
need-to-know and don't know anything about.


Cheers,

Robert







[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com