UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jan > Jan 2

Re: New Year Agenda - Stacy

From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 15:09:34 -0600
Fwd Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 17:29:36 -0500
Subject: Re: New Year Agenda - Stacy


 >From: Jerome Clark <jkclark@frontiernet.net>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >Subject: Re: New Year Agenda
 >Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:40:26 -0600

<snip>

 >Where Roswell is concerned, one can argue either way (and any
 >argument, con or pro, will highlight what it wants to while
 >relegating to the sidelines what doesn't serve the case). But
 >Dennis's particular objection to it reeks of, shall we say, less
 >than profound reflection.

 >Jerry Clark

Jerry,

I'm not the one arguing that secrets are so easily kept. I think
you have me confused with... Stanton Friedman.

I'm making the same observation you and Gates are: it's patently
obvious that there are all sorts of leakers or willing talkers
out there, else we wouldn't know as much about many things as we
do.

I just want Stan to admit same, and, having done so, lighten up
on his never ending assertion that of course secrets can be
kept, as if the mere presence of rules for secret keeping
insured success.

If it did, no one from the 509th would ever have admitted to
being involved in the recovery of alien bodies. Since they did,
it's patently obvious that having a system of
compartmentalization, need to know, and/or whatever in place is
no guarantee that secrets will remain safe.

It's not really that difficult a concept to grasp. I'm sorry if
it seems to be giving you trouble.


Dennis Stacy





[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com