UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2002 > Jan > Jan 2

Re: Bottom Line on Walter Haut - Gates

From: Robert Gates <RGates8254@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 01:42:46 EST
Fwd Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2002 14:07:45 -0500
Subject: Re: Bottom Line on Walter Haut - Gates

 >From: Wendy Connors <projectsign@worldnet.att.net>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >Subject: Re: Bottom Line on Walter Haut
 >Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:27:10 -0700

 >>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254@aol.com>
 >>Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 23:21:26 EST
 >>UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
 >>Subject: Bottom Line On Walter Haut


 >>4) I predict that when the Oral History becomes public all the
 >>researchers who didn't get a chance to view and see the
 >>history will belittle and debunk everything in it for the
 >>usual assortment of reasons, stories and so forth. We will be
 >>treated to tales about how Walter's reasons (which may have
 >>been totally heartfelt by him) were really wrong, misleading
 >>and why he was a total liar.

 >>5) Speculating about the contents of Walt's Oral history
 >>interview is similar to a newspaper speculating and
 >>theorizing about the contents of a classified document,
 >>without actually seeing what was written in the document. The
 >>bottom line is no matter what or who says what, the
 >>information won't be available for awhile.


 >>While many people seem captivated with the idea of 'Well Walt
 >>didn't tell the story earlier, so all this is age, or
 >>misleading, or tall tale telling.'


 >Perhaps your thoughts above are the forboding elements yet to
 >come. Many have certainly been vociferous enough already to
 >condemn in half-truths, etc, unshamelessly, in order for the few
 >to pompously prance in their own egotistical foppery in order to
 >convince themselves that they are the masters of that which no
 >other persons should be allowed to contemplate or bear witness.

Hi Wendy,

I truly hope it doesn't happen, but sadly I suspect it will.

 >I am no longer sure the more congregate of crypto-aeronautics
 >deserve that which would be revealed, strictly from the previous
 >assasination of credibility, in regard to knowledge or
 >enlightenment that might be shared.

 >Therefore, I am pulling in my public involvement with
 >crypto-aeronautics and will, from this point forward, keep my
 >work, research and discoveries private. Shared with only the

I wouldn't worry about keeping your discoveries quiet unless the
principles involved (Walt) wishes that material is not
disclosed. At that point I wouldn't even publicly reveal the
name of the person until after whatever time line they set.

 >closest associates I trust. Most of my work and archives will be
 >available publicly only after my death and in the interim, by
 >invitation only. This will be my last post to UFO UpDates.

People are just ignorant in thinking they've 'interviewed
everybody' so "I know everything". They may not know everything
because the person may not choose to reveal everything.

Personally I would keep posting to UpDates....



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com