From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:57:06 EST
Fwd Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:06:24 -0500
Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis & ET Fact - Young


 >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 01:13:31 -0400
 >From: Donald Ledger <dledger@ns.sympatico.ca>
 >To: updates@sympatico.ca
 >Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis & ET Fact

 >>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com>
 >>Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 21:50:18 EST
 >>Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis & ET Fact
 >>To: updates@sympatico.ca

<snip>

 >>2) Birds, pelican or otherwise.

 >I know you had to mention this so as to not hurt Easton's
 >feelings. But no.

Hi, Don,

Hey, gotta cover for my wing-man.

 >>3) A bright, daytime, fragmenting meteor. The newest theory -
 >>put forth recently by Uncle Phil Klass. Has possibilities.).

 >Horizontal meteors? Traveling at only 1,200 mph?

If the meteor is at typical altitude for a fireball (>20 miles)
it would be much further away and the speed would be
proportionately greater.

 >>4) U.S. secret sub-sonic aircraft flying in formation, whose
 >>distance Arnold had misjudged.

 >Would have been close enough to identify then.

How far away were the mountain peaks? A 30-foot long aircraft
would have cut a very small figure. Isn't one of the problems
that no one knows precisely where Arnold was?

 >>4) Soviet secret supersonic aircraft flying in formation.

 >Yeah right-over Washington state??

Yes, clearly dizinformation.

 >>7) Nine genuine ET craft, ET piloted or robotically controlled.

 >Occum's razor??

Appropriately placed near the very end, so as not to cut _my_
throat.

 >>8) Angels, Seraphim, Apollo in his Sun chariot pulled by nine
 >>horses, or nine other OI/NHIs, etc.

 >>Well, that's it, Greg. I would even go for ETs before the
 >>rapture.

 >A wise move Bob.

Didn't mean prior to the rapture.

 >>May there always be Clear, Cloudless Skies and a Temperature
 >>Inversion over the Cascades in July,

 >As you know an inversion would not work here due to Arnold's
 >altitude and the respective altitude of the craft. Depressed
 >angle. Stable air that day with cold air up to higher
 >altitudes.To high for temp inversion.

Yes, you are right. This was a hastily chosen sign-off. The
inversion was in the valley in front of or _behind_ the peaks,
thus possibly causing a superior mirage of peaks over the
horizon. Of course, Arnold's altitude matters, but then no one
knows what it was, or how far away from the peaks he was, or
exactly where he was, or exactly which peaks he meant.


Clear skies, wherever you are,

Bob Young

From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 01:57:06 EST
Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis & ET Fact
To: updates@sympatico.ca


 >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 01:13:31 -0400
 >From: Donald Ledger <dledger@ns.sympatico.ca>
 >To: updates@sympatico.ca
 >Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis & ET Fact

 >>From: Bob Young <YoungBob2@aol.com>
 >>Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 21:50:18 EST
 >>Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis & ET Fact
 >>To: updates@sympatico.ca

<snip>

 >>2) Birds, pelican or otherwise.

 >I know you had to mention this so as to not hurt Easton's
 >feelings. But no.

Hi, Don,

Hey, gotta cover for my wing-man.

 >>3) A bright, daytime, fragmenting meteor. The newest theory -
 >>put forth recently by Uncle Phil Klass. Has possibilities.).

 >Horizontal meteors? Traveling at only 1,200 mph?

If the meteor is at typical altitude for a fireball (>20 miles)
it would be much further away and the speed would be
proportionately greater.

 >>4) U.S. secret sub-sonic aircraft flying in formation, whose
 >>distance Arnold had misjudged.

 >Would have been close enough to identify then.

How far away were the mountain peaks? A 30-foot long aircraft
would have cut a very small figure. Isn't one of the problems
that no one knows precisely where Arnold was?

 >>4) Soviet secret supersonic aircraft flying in formation.

 >Yeah right-over Washington state??

Yes, clearly dizinformation.

 >>7) Nine genuine ET craft, ET piloted or robotically controlled.

 >Occum's razor??

Appropriately placed near the very end, so as not to cut _my_
throat.

 >>8) Angels, Seraphim, Apollo in his Sun chariot pulled by nine
 >>horses, or nine other OI/NHIs, etc.

 >>Well, that's it, Greg. I would even go for ETs before the
 >>rapture.

 >A wise move Bob.

Didn't mean prior to the rapture.

 >>May there always be Clear, Cloudless Skies and a Temperature
 >>Inversion over the Cascades in July,

 >As you know an inversion would not work here due to Arnold's
 >altitude and the respective altitude of the craft. Depressed
 >angle. Stable air that day with cold air up to higher
 >altitudes.To high for temp inversion.

Yes, you are right. This was a hastily chosen sign-off. The
inversion was in the valley in front of or _behind_ the peaks,
thus possibly causing a superior mirage of peaks over the
horizon. Of course, Arnold's altitude matters, but then no one
knows what it was, or how far away from the peaks he was, or
exactly where he was, or exactly which peaks he meant.


Clear skies, wherever you are,

Bob Young