From: Serge Salvaille <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:46:21 -0400 Fwd Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:24:43 -0400 Subject: Re: Debunkers' Guidebook - Salvaille >From: Jerome Clark <email@example.com> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Subject: Re: Debunkers' Guidebook >Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:10:05 -0500 >>Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:14:20 +0100 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >>From: John Rimmer <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>Subject: Re: Debunkers' Guidebook <snip> >Now, expecting once again a blatant refusal to answer a simple >question, I nonetheless try again: >Do you reject as effectively meaningless and misguided all >reports in which witnesses -- including technically trained >ones, under excellent viewing conditions -- report structured >objects whose appearances and performance characteristics are >unlike those even of the most advanced military and civilian >aircraft? <snip> Jerry, You win the question of the millenium award. You could have added: "A simple yes or no will be sufficient". That should clean up the atmosphere. Still...
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp