From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 09:00:37 -0300
Fwd Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2000 11:04:51 -0400
Subject: UpDate: Re: UFO TV Documentaries? - Friedman


 >Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 09:31:49 -0400
 >From: Victor J. Kean <VICTOR_J_KEAN@compuserve.com>
 >Subject: Re: UFO TV Documentaries? -
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@sympatico.ca>

 >>Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:15:05 -0300
 >>From: Stan Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
 >>Subject: Re: UFO TV Documentaries?
 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@sympatico.ca>

 >>>Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:36:13 -0400
 >>>From: Ron Cecchini <Ron.Cecchini@GD-CS.COM>
 >>>Subject: Re: UFO TV Documentaries?
 >>>To: 'UFO Updates' <updates@sympatico.ca>

 >Stan wrote:-

 >>There has been an enormous amount of effort put in to the Hill
 >>Case. I met with Betty and Barney and John Fuller and Marjorie
 >>Fish and spoke with Dr. Simon. I reviewed Marjorie's work with
 >>Terence Dickinson then editor of ASTRONOMY and with Dr. George
 >>Mitchell an astronomer at OSU as well as with Allen Hynek.

 >>It stands up very well, despite false attacks by the likes of
 >>Sagan, Vallee and many others who misrepresented what MF did.

 >Stan,

 >Correct me if I am wrong, but surely MF only 'identified' 15 out
 >of the 28 stars on Betty Hill's map. What about the remainder ?


She focused on the stars connected with lines, trade routes,
occasional expeditions, etc. Turns out that they were all
sun-like stars and also all the sunlike stars in the volume of
the map. As it happens they were all in a plane as well Actually
there were 16 including the sun. Hardly a coincidence as
investigated by several astronomers and described in the Zeta
Reticuli Incident.

The others were background noise.

Stan Friedman