From: Tony Spurrier <TSpurrier@compuserve.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 06:04:15 -0400
Fwd Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 03:01:39 -0400
Subject: Re: When Disclosure Serves Secrecy


 >Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:23:46 +0000
 >Subject: UFO UpDate: When Disclosure Serves Secrecy
 >From: Stephen MILES Lewis <elfis@austin.rr.com>
 >To: UFO UpDates <updates@globalserve.net>

 >I've been worried about Dr. Greer and others push for "an end to
 >ufo secrecy" for the reasons obvious if you've read any of
 >Vallee's 1979 _Messengers of Deception_ as well as his
 >subsequent books; the probability that such disclosure would be
 >manipulated as a continuance of the manipulations that have gone
 >before. Greer seems to have wisened up to this same scenario's
 >probability.

Stephen

What Greer hasn't wised up to is the fact that he has been
saying for years that he's on the verge of a paradigm shifting
UFO disclosure, yet two and half years after their Washington
meeting they are no nearer disclosing anything.

If you ever get to question them over this you'll receive
standard replies which side step the issue and leave the
disclosure just out of grasp. You'll hear that the witnesses
will only testify under oath infront of congress, yet the
meeting in Washington two years ago wasn't done under oath.
You'll then hear that they fear for their lives, yet have names
and photographs on their website of those that spoke in
Washington. lastly you'll that they need funding for a
disclosure documentary, which is apparently under way, but they
seem to forget that their witnesses will only speak under oath
at a congressional hearing.

The action is simple, organise a world wide press conference and
get the witnesses to speak enmass and stop pussy footing around
demanding funds.

 >Military interests, which are heavily involved in covert
 >projects which hoax ET events, such as human military- related
 >abductions, have a shared goal of demonizing the UFO/ET
 >phenomenon.

Greer allegedly has witnesses who will testify that alien
abductions are psychotronic military abductions and/or
government cloned et's. He has been sitting on this information,
holding it for ransom, rather than put a stop to these
experiences. Of course we have to take his word that this
information is genuine. If it is true Greer is guilty by
association with these covert forces.

 >And remember: Part of this disclosure plan involves the use of
 >UFO look-alike devices made by humans in an attack on earth or
 >military assets of earth. This would be a well-orchestrated use
 >of advanced human technologies to hoax an ET attack - all for
 >the purpose of disclosing the truth with the desired
 >military-oriented spin. In such a scenario, most of humanity
 >will be deceived into believing the threat from space has
 >arrived - and that we must fight it at all costs. This is
 >nothing more than long-term social security for the
 >military-industrial complex. There must be people who can expose
 >this fraud.

Funny how Greer shirks responsibility, he claims to have a
witness who holds this information. At the Washington briefings
the witness allegedly pulled out at the last minute because the
big bad military had changed their minds. Seems now they've
changed their minds again, or is this scare mongering for funds?
The witness Greer had is so top secret you can find his photo on
their website!

 >But why should we wait for these darker scenarios to be
 >unleashed on an unsuspecting world?

This is the question that everyone should be asking Greer, why
are you sitting on this information?

 >Here is another idea: Why don't 'we the people' unite and launch
 >a disclosure which resembles the first one described above. An
 >honest one. One which leads to peace, not war. To a sustainable
 >and beautiful world, free of pollution and brimming with
 >abundance, of all types. One which reaches out into the unknown,
 >instead of firing particle beam weapons into the darkness of
 >space.

The ransom note arrives.

CSETI claim to have the truth, so why don't they simply hire a
conference suite, invite the worlds media, and let these
witnesses talk? Answer, that's not how holding information for
ransom works!

Tony