From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 17:07:50 +0000
Fwd Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:43:36 -0500
Subject: Re: On False Memory


 >Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 23:25:23 -0800
 >From: Larry Hatch <larryhat@jps.net>
 >Subject: Re: On False Memory
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@sympatico.ca>

 >>Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 20:05:13 -0500 (EST)
 >>From: Jim Mortellaro <Jsmortell@aol.com>
 >>Subject: Re: On False Memory
 >>To: updates@sympatico.ca

 >>>Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:50:51 +0000
 >>>From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
 >>>Subject: Re: On False Memory
 >>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@sympatico.ca>

 >Dear Jim and Jenny:

 >One word has me puzzled. Jenny said something like "In a
 >sceotical nation like the UK..."

 >Sceotical? I don't know what sceotical means, and my dictionary
 >is hidden under several layers of dust.

 >Nevertheless I'm willing to wager that the denizens of
 >California are as sceotical as anyone else, especially down in
 >the Los Angeles area.

 >"Sceotical" sounds like a highly majuberous term to me. Was it a
 >typo?

 >Very best wishes

 >- Larry Hatch

Hi,

Yes it was a typo. I was rushing because I have two sets of page
proofs, two indexes and 10,000 words to write for a book by
Christmas.

Sceotical should, of course, be septical. [Uh, sceptical? --ebk]

Best wishes,

Jenny Randles