Re: 'New?' FBI memo about Roswell
From: Mac Tonnies <Alintelbot@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 21:01:03 EDT
Fwd Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 01:29:56 -0400
Subject: Re: 'New?' FBI memo about Roswell
"The Pelican" wrote:
>From: Dennis Stacy <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 00:37:07 -0500
>Fwd Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 09:18:44 -0400
>Subject: 'New?' FBI memo about Roswell
>Has Neil Morris been staring at his computer monitor too long,
>or do you agree that the pictures Bond Johnson took in Ramey's
>office are pictures of the 'Real Thing' (as Morris claims)?
>Or do you think that the pictures Morris is analyzing to death
>("See the glyphs! They're everywhere!") are actually those of
>the substituted debris, in other words, a weather balloon and
I, for one, have looked quite closely at the results of Morris'
analysis and I can say with virtually 100% confidence that there
are no glyphs (at least none that are visible). Wad aluminum foil
up and you get a myriad enticing little "shapes," which one can
interpret to be just about anything. This is the same flaw _some_
independent investigators of the Cydonian anomalies have made:
finding erroneous "signals" among the noise.
Who was it, though, who mentioned Marcel darting about the office
trying to convince him that some of the alleged "markings" looked
"alien"...? I think it was Irving Newton; this could be wrong.
All the best,