From: Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 20:09:27 -0700
Fwd Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 07:27:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Asking Pamela Stonebrooke


>From: Cathy Johnson <cej@idirect.ca>
>To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Asking Pamela Stonebrooke
>Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 10:07:31 -0400

>>Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1998 07:29:52 -0700
>>From: Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Asking Pamela Stonebrooke

>>>Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 12:55:01 -0500
>>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>>From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net>
>>>Subject: Asking Pamela Stonebrooke

>><snip>

>Although it is possible to see patterns emerging with recalled
>memories, it must be remembered that those memories are only
>artifacts of mental processes.  Whether truth or relative
>information is contained in those memories, is only relevant to
>the individual.  And, the individual is subject to as much
>internal as well as external motives and purposes regarding the
>control of memories.

This assumes that these are "memories," meaning that there was a
period of forgetfulness, and then "recall."  If I understand
Pamela's story correctly this does NOT describe her experience.

If you don't mean the above, then how do you refer to my
"memory" of typing the previous paragraph?  Is this just an
"artifact of mental processes?"  I don't think so.

>The product of personality is evolved from critical factors of
>perception and capabilities that allow conditioned perceptions of
>experience.  As much by chance as by habit do we see beyond our
>mundane filters and conditioning.  So, the stage must be set to
>explore and accept new values as we wander through experience.

Absolutely.  And there's no question that we color our
experience. But that doesn't mean that it is all fantasy,
confabulation or any one of a host of terms that some like to
apply to the abduction experience.

--

Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>
ICQ Pager 6797092