From: bruce maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 01:08:42 -0400
Fwd Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 20:47:56 -0400
Subject: Re: Occam's Razor and UFOs


>Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:25:13 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
>From: Nick Balaskas <nikolaos@YorkU.CA>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Occam's Razor and UFOs

>Greetings,

>To all those who participated in this on going discussion on
>Occam's Razor and UFOs (and those who did not but might like
>to), can anyone tell me who correctly applied Occam's Razor to
t>he two very similiar E.T. related cases below?

<snip>

>Can we really conclude that one specimen is of E.T. origin while
>another is not if the assumptions made and the tests performed
>are identical? This Physics Today article may turn out to be a
>very important one for ufology. If not, at least it does show
>that interstellar visits are possible (after all, unintelligent
>rock particles can do it).>>

>Nick Balaskas


HAW HAW HAW.

As I said before, Occam's Razor is a double edged blade. It cuts
both ways.