From: bruce maccabee <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 00:03:57 -0400 Fwd Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 08:53:31 -0400 Subject: Re: Sturrock Panel/skeptics >To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <email@example.com> >From: Jerome Clark <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Sturrock Panel/skeptics >Date: Mon, 06 Jul 98 10:20:24 PDT >The shape of the debunker response to the Sturrock panel is >already becoming clear. Like the New York Post, a nearly >hysterical editorial in the current issue of New Scientist links >the SSE with all sorts of other heresies and condemns UFOs as >evidence of mass ... well, fill in your nasty noun here. >Basically, the thought police are determined that nobody, least >of all a scientist, is going to get by with acknowledging the >obvious: that the best UFO reports continue to resist explanation >and maybe, just maybe, deserve scientific attention. Such is the >heresy that menaces civilization. Ad hominem attack...... without giving names in the article (so people who read the paper version won't know) they refer to members of SSE such as a "perptual motion machine" guy and to a guy who moves things mentally. (Web readers will find a link to Harold Puthoff's web site and another link to the Robert Jahn at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) site.). If you can't attack the message attack the messenger(s).
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp