UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Oct > Oct 25

Re: Solved abduction cases?

From: James Easton <pulsar@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 20:54:11 -0400
Fwd Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 19:49:44 -0400
Subject: Re: Solved abduction cases?

Regarding...

>Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 01:22:34 -0500
>From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Solved abduction cases?

John wrote:

>Henny writes,

>>Not only is the ET hypothesis taken seriously outside the USA,
>>government officials of several countries, such as Chile,
>>Belgium, Mexico and Russia, have openly stated that their air
>>space has been violated by craft that do not originate on this
>>earth.


>Now this is one piece of reality that you'll never see debated!


John,

The reality is, if I may paraphrase, that, with rare exceptions, there
is no indication the ET hypothesis is taken seriously by the vast
majority of government officials, either within the USA or elsewhere.


>Here we have "official" government releases of information, some of
>it formidable as in the case of the Belgium government, (military,
>radar data, reports from credible sources on the ground -Gendarme-
>etc.) and yet it is still not taken as an "official announcement"
>that something 'out of the ordinary,'...'possibly not of this earth'
>is -hoopty doin it- in our skies.

The Belgium reference is a good example of the questionable data which
some government officials base their beliefs on. It could be pointed
out that rather than an ET origin, the reports of triangular UFOs
which proliferated from December 1989, might have a connection with
the unidentified isosceles-triangle shaped aircraft which recognition
expert Chris Gibson witnessed flying with a KC-135 Stratotanker and
two F-111s only three months previous.

Or that the F-16 radar data from the Belgium flap was _officially_
explained by the Belgian Air force as ground clutter and no pilot ever
witnessed an actual object.

Etc.


>About a year ago I put this same piece of information on the
>table in another thread Henny, the silence was deafening. It must
>be a hard set of facts to rationalize/debunk I guess!

The facts are that a few such individuals believe the ET hypothesis
to be true. No government which, as an entity, refutes the question
of ET visitations, and last I heard that was all of them, seems
currently troubled by any suggestion to the contrary.

Or would appear to give the matter more than a passing thought.

That wasn't necessarily so some 40-50 years ago, but the ET question
is long assumed to be answered and, dare I say, isn't terribly
challenged by contemporary scientific evidence.


There seems to be no case, certainly in context, for any government
being concerned that their air space is being violated by ET
spaceships.

There are for sure some apparently unexplained intrusions, but it
seems nothing of sufficient consequence to tag on an ET label. I do
however wonder about the 6 January 1995 UK airmiss with a
"wedge-shaped" object. If this was really a true "unknown", as
officially recorded in the Commercial Air Transport Airmiss Report,
what was the outcome when those in serious power took stock. Did they
sit looking at one another and collectively shrug shoulders.

I suspect when we're old and grey, the CIA will reveal that in the
1980s and 90s, their then top secret stealth spy plane was responsible
for 52% of all UFO reports.



James.
E-mail: pulsar@compuserve.com


Search for other documents from or mentioning: pulsar | jvif

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com