From: Dave Everett <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 21:26:51 +1000 Fwd Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1997 09:11:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Zeta Notso Ridiculouso >Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 20:14:32 +0100 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >From: Sean Jones <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Zeta Notso Ridiculouso >>Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 14:15:57 +0100 >>From: Mike Smith <email@example.com> >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Zeta Notso Ridiculous ><Stanton> "Depends on vision will and money. Like going to the moon on >the day 40 years ago today when Sputnick went up. Many thought then it >would never happen. >Probably the emphasis is on MONEY. The root of all evils etc etc, but >cost is probably the most mitigating factor. "We" may well have the >technology to visit other stars in our childrens lifetimes but the cost >with present technology is exorbitant. >As to the speed of light being the speed limit of the universe, "we" now >have _proof_ that this is simply no longer so. The proof is in the form >of Tachyons. Tahcyons have a minimum speed limit of c, so in my humble >opinion ftl drives are possible." It's my understanding that 'Tachyons" are hypothetical particles, like 'negative energy'. Does anyone have a reference for real tachyons? Dave Everett.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp