From: Michael Wayne Malone <wayne@fly.HiWAAY.net> Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 06:14:49 -0500 (CDT) Fwd Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 13:01:42 -0400 Subject: Re: Abduction Sat 4 Oct 1997 > From: firstname.lastname@example.org [Lawrie Williams] > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 07:36:06 +1000 (GMT+1000) > To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Abduction Sat 4 Oct 1997. > Abduction Oct 4 1997 > I told D that she could reassure her friend she would come to no > harm. I was told J is not afraid, just very curious. Neither girl > would dream of trying to tell their parents about this. > I told her in my opinion the visitation was by an actual craft > with humanoids, because this is consistent with similar incidents > taking place around the world. I said the experience would have > slipped into a dream, like the part about running through the > woods. > I told D that K could expect a phantom pregnancy, but that it would > be ended with another visitation. I said this could be three months, > but that perhaps someone on the Internet could give me a more likely > "term". (K is unlikely to be pregnant by any human, so it looks like > a classic potential "maiden birth", what is mistakenly known as > "virgin birth" since ancient times - a mistranslation.) > > I told her that it could be possible that the purpose of all this > was to make hybrids, half like us and half like them. WHY DID YOU DO THIS????????????????????? From this point on, any further data gained from these subjects is tainted. If they have any experiances that in any way match what you told them, there is no way of knowing the real from the imaginary planted by you. This is a typical example of BAD fieldwork.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp