UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Oct > Oct 11

Re: Solved Abduction cases?

From: Dennis <dstacy@texas.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 12:25:15 -0500 (CDT)
Fwd Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 14:24:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Solved Abduction cases?

>Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 21:47:34 -0700
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Solved Abduction cases?

>>I like Eddie, too. The question here is what does "pretty hard"
>>mean? If you want to see a blatant example of leading, you have
>>only to re-read John Mack. At one point, one of his witnesses
>>won't go up a ramp during a hypnosis session, so he tells her to
>>imagine she's a remote-controlled video camera and go up the ramp
>>-- which she promptly does.

>Without actually going back and rereading Mack, I fail to see why
>using the camera device, *once the hypnosis subject has already
>identified the presence of a ramp*, constitutes leading.

>Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>

Because it compels the "witness" to "see" or report something that they may
or may not have seen. Now, we will never know for sure, will we?


Search for other documents from or mentioning: dstacy | turel33

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com