UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Oct > Oct 11

Re: Witness Anonymity

From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 03:41:40 -0500
Fwd Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 10:04:20 -0400
Subject: Re: Witness Anonymity

>From: "C Hathaway & J. Presson" <earthwrk@doitnow.com>
>To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Witness Anonymity
>Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 22:41:28 -0700


>>From: HONEYBE100@aol.com [Linda Cortile]
>>Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 04:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>Subject: Re: Witness Anonymity

>>>From: XianneKei@aol.com (Rebecca Schatte)
>>>Date: Tue. 7 Oct. 1997 17:32:10 -0400 (EDT)
>>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>>Subject: Fwd: Witness Anonymity

>>Hi Errol & everyone!

>>This is my last post for a couple of weeks.   {I can hear the
>crowd
>>cheering, Hooray!!}  <G>

>YES!!!!

You take pleasure in some very odd things Julianne. I just
thought it worthy of note to mention the 'negative' nature of
this joy you exhibit. Kind of like the joy some children take in
pulling the wings off of flies. What's even stranger is the sense
of pride that you exude when you soil yourself publicly. <VBG>

>This from the woman who filmed her minor child and gave the video
>to Hopkins, who gave at least one copy out without Linda's approval???

I wish you'd read the posts that you're commenting on! Linda
clearly stated in an earlier post that she consented to the video
at the behest of Budd on the grounds that it would be an
important research document.

Although I am a firm believer that young and impressionable
children should not be involved in any form of 'public' activity
with regard to abduction, I can understand how Linda might have
felt that she was contributing something important to the
information pool (for future generations as she was told by Budd)
Shoot when viewed from certain angles her action may even be
considered courageous and noble. Although, as attested to by the
outcome, one that was extremely ill advised.

My perception of Linda is almost diametrically opposed to your
own, but then I've known her for several years, we've broken
bread together at my table, and have become close enough to share
'life stuff' that is usually reserved for trusted friends. I know
what I'm about to say will never pass through that fortress of a
wall that you've constructed,... but,

- You're wrong about Linda - She's a very open, honest and direct
person. Unlike an awful lot of other people I've met, with Linda
WYSIWYG.

>Right they will not trust Hopkins with their home made videos.

You may want to direct more of your venom at Budd for having
suggesting it, and worse yet giving a copy to someone else. (Who
I believe was a high ranking MUFON official. I'd like him taken
to task as well for this blatant disregard of Linda's child and
any negative effect that this may have created for him)

Linda is simply the wrong person to blame. You are attacking the
victim not the perpetrators. Shame on you. And, do your homework!
All I had to do was make a couple of well placed calls and I got
the whole 'poop' on the situation. You're so busy feeding on the
carrion of Linda's carcass, that you completely missed the trail
left by the ones that did her in.

Your posts sound so bitter and so personal that I wonder if it's
worth talking to you at all. I hope some of this gets through so
you can move on to more pressing issues.

Budd made a request he should never have made,...( boner number
one!)

Linda (unfortunately, ill advisedly) complied.

Budd leaked the tape,...( boner number two!)

The guy he leaked it too, leaked it to the world! ( boner number
three and the by far the worst of the lot. Although I won't
excuse it, I can almost understand Budd's reasons for wanting
such a document. What I can't understand is the - "third man" <G>
- allowing it to be distributed by the media!

Linda gets royally screwed. (By boner/bonehead number one, two,
and three!)

How do you figure that it's Linda that you should be ragging so.
Your energies are so misdirected, and so obviously personal in
nature that in essence you disqualify yourself from conducting
any kind of a constructive discussion with Linda. Nothing
fruitful will ever come of the tack you've taken with her. You've
created one of the _nastiest_ threads on the list and that's no
lie.

You seem very smug and self-confident that you are "looking very
good" here. Reality check Julianne, you're not! With every new
'poison pen letter' that you post you reveal a very nasty and
condescending side of yourself. Those energies would be better
spent hiding those traits, or dare I suggest it,
mastering/overcoming them!

>It is simple, you keep adding to and changing the story. You said
>you had no idea how the tape got out there in the real world. Then
>you say you made it gave it to Hopkins, and Hopkins gave out at
>least one copy.

>Seems very clear to me....and allot of other people

There's only "one thing" that is "clear" Julianne, and oddly
enough it has nothing to do with Linda! <G>

If you can't conduct a civil dialog with Linda then _PLEASE_ step
off and let someone with better interpersonal skills take over,
I'm more than a little sick of sitting back quietly and watching
you spray venom at Linda unchecked.

Well,...

Schachmat!

John Velez, US Chess Federation Member since 1972 ;)




                              John Velez
                          jvif@spacelab.net





Search for other documents from or mentioning: jvif | earthwrk | honeybe100 | xiannekei

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com