UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Oct > Oct 11

Re: Solved Abduction cases?

From: Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 21:47:34 -0700
Fwd Date: Sat, 11 Oct 1997 09:02:13 -0400
Subject: Re: Solved Abduction cases?

>Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 17:18:37 -0500 (CDT)
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Dennis <dstacy@texas.net> [Dennis Stacy]
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Solved Abduction cases?

>>From: clark@canby.mn.frontiercomm.net [Jerome Clark]
>>Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 10:02:02 PDT
>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>Subject: RE: UFO UpDate: Re: Solved Abduction cases?

>I like Eddie, too. The question here is what does "pretty hard"
>mean? If you want to see a blatant example of leading, you have
>only to re-read John Mack. At one point, one of his witnesses
>won't go up a ramp during a hypnosis session, so he tells her to
>imagine she's a remote-controlled video camera and go up the ramp
>-- which she promptly does.

Without actually going back and rereading Mack, I fail to see why
using the camera device, *once the hypnosis subject has already
identified the presence of a ramp*, constitutes leading.

Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>

Search for other documents from or mentioning: turel33 | dstacy | clark

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com