From: Steven Kaeser <email@example.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 13:33:36 -0400 Fwd Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1997 22:01:08 -0400 Subject: Re: Witness Anonymity >Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 04:31:23 -0500 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> >From: John Velez <email@example.com> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Witness Anonymity >>From: Penrose Christopher <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>Date: Wed, 8 Oct 97 19:51:22 +0900 >>To: email@example.com >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Witness Anonymity >>>>"Re: Witness Anonymity" is starting to look like this week's "thread >>>>of shame" on the Area 51 mailing list. UFOlogy is showing its best >>>>face to the world. >>>Well, wrong area. This is not the Area 51 Mailing List, nor is it the >>>"Linda List" either. >(massive snip) >>You are more interested in galloping into battle than communication. >>This is what I criticize, and you have made me into a greater enemy >>than I am. >>Christopher Penrose >Hey, did someone open a window? I can swear there is a hint of 'fresh air.' >Hope it's not my imagination. Restoring a sense of 'communication' and >information sharing/debating would be a welcome relief. >There is absolutely no reason why -anyone- on this list should be >'attacked' for any reason. (Self-defense excluded, righteous indignation >is just that, righteous!) you guys don't know how lucky you are to have >access to some of the folks that participate on this list. Beginning with >my battered friend Linda. I thought that Errol had asked that this thread be halted a while back, but I assume that one of the more recent messages had new information that he felt was relevent and deserved further discussion. I am very grateful for the variety of opinions and expertise that we have available to us, and would hope that discussions here would remain above the level of name calling.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp