From: HONEYBE100@aol.com Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:54:39 -0400 (EDT) Fwd Date: Sun, 05 Oct 1997 01:07:09 -0400 Subject: Re: Witness Anonymity >Subj: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Witness Anonymity >Date: 97-10-04 16:00:29 EDT >From: email@example.com (Julianne Presson) >To: firstname.lastname@example.org (UFO UpDates - Toronto) Julianne Presson wrote: Major snips... >If you do not want anyone knowing who you are WHY did you use your >real name in the first place. You did it to yourself. So stop blaming >everyone else for your problems. The sooner you stop being the "victim" >here the sooner you get on with life. Although there are "perks" to being >a "victim" all the time. You do not have to take responsibility for ANY of >your actions or the decisions you make regarding yourself or your minor >children. Oh, please!!! You've got to be kidding!! Your post doesn't sound as though you're up on the details of my case and all that's surrounding it! No, I won't bite your head off yet because you sound more like a victim than I do! Let me give you a clue. I have never used my real name in the first place. Maybe you should read up more on what's been going on. UFO UpDates, Toronto has a good web site and they're archives are hugh. >Yes your son is a minor and YOU are the "adult" who gave permission >for him to be filmed. Sorry you are the one who is responsible here for >him being on the film in the first place. Had you said NO he would not >be on the video. I'll guess that you don't know much about research or investigations either. Tsk tsk. Video's are commonly made of UFO's and the witnesses. However, when a person's wish for witness anonymity is not respected the blame goes to the blabber-mouth, not the witness. >Oh PLEASE....get out of the "victim role" for a mintue and ask yourself >why you would allow ANYONE involved with abduction research to film >your minor child??? Uh... pardon me? Get with it, Julianne! If I didn't get involved with an abduction researcher, I might not have understood what was going on with my family and me. This video was an important aspect of my case. However, it was supposed to stay behind closed doors. >Why people allow someone who uses the faulty hypnosis modality he >uses on them or their kids is beyond me. I have seen him in action on Discovery Channel and he would be better served to spend a few years >getting some education and practical experience. His showing pictures >of grays to kids under 7 years old and then uses hypnosis on them >that is suggestive at the least and invalidates any data gathered in the >sessions. In your opinion and some others, hypnosis is faulty. But not in my opinion as far as my case is concerned. Where did you get this information about Budd hypnotizing children? From Phil Klass? You must have watched the NOVA programming last year. It was a sham!!! This show was geared to make abduction research look criminal. John Velez can elaborate more on that if he wishes to. >Now have one of your temper tantrums over this message. Frankly, >your continued "horn blowing" in this List about everyone taking advan- >tage of you is getting boring. This is NOT a therapy group, it is a >mailing list. No. I won't have a temper tantrum because you aren't worth it. But you're absolutely right. This is not a therapy group, it's a mailing list. So, I suggest that you go and get some therapy. Here's another suggestion, if you're bored. Don't read the "Witness Anonymity" posts, that's all! Learn how to knitt!!! Good day to you, Julianne!! (Door slams shut)! Linda Cortile research team.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp