|
From: Skye Turell <turel33@west.net> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 14:31:34 -0700 Fwd Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 19:57:39 -0400 Subject: Re: Solved Abduction cases? >Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 13:25:31 -0500 (CDT) >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >From: Dennis <dstacy@texas.net> [Dennis Stacy] >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Solved Abduction cases? >>From: nick@emailme.at.address.below (Nick Humphries) >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Solved Abduction cases? >>Date: Sat, 04 Oct 1997 13:06:57 GMT >There's an Australian abduction case --maybe someone, Chris R., can supply a >citation -- in which a woman, I believe, claimed to be being abducted while, >at the time, she was actually sitting in a car seat next to one of the >investigators. Seems unlikely ET was invovled in that one! How do you know the investigator's perceptions were "unbroken?" That there wasn't a lapse of consciousness in which the abductee was gone? And, although I hate to be so metaphysical with this particular audience (Wait a sec, while I don my flame-proof suit), there certainly have been experiences, not necessarily within the abduction arena, where people experienced two simultaneous versions of "reality." No, wait, here's one from the abduction arena: I do seem to recall an experience of Betty Luca in which she saw herself lying on a couch, paging through a magazine at the end of an abduction experience, meaning that perhaps the ETs had somehow fragmented her consciousness/body in such a way that she was two places at once. Need I remind everyone that there is much about these events that is extremely multidimensional-seeming, and since none of us knows much about that, we're hardly in a position to comment on what's possible (or even likely) or not. If you're going to insist on these events maintaining strict adherence to traditional physics, you're in the wrong business. Budd Hopkins has a case, from Australia I believe, in which a woman and her son were abducted right out of a park, "in plain sight" of many people, including the woman's husband who was taking her picture at the time. (It's an interesting picture, full of red haziness.) And Linda Cortile's family has experienced similar events. (And, no, I can't prove any of this happened, and probably neither can Budd, so get off my case!) I raise all this because your assumption that "ET involvement seems unlikely," is not all that certain a proposition. >if so inclined, one could chart the experience as a straight >line moving from left (Sighting) to right (Release) with other >discrete events (Capture, Examination, Tour, etc {Bullard's eight >stages]) at other points along the line. OK, but your objection is based on the assumption that line is traveling across only the surface of one dimension. What if it "travels" through to another space-time (or even to points outside of space-time entirely)? Then any number of possibilities open up. >It won't come as a great revelation here, but there is an awful lot >about abductions that don't make sense. Doesn't make sense to our traditional ways of understanding things. But obviously we're going to have to expand our thinking a little bit. ;-) >For example, if alien technology is so advanced (the ability to >hover invisibly, beam people through solid objects, etc.), why are >the aliens' medical procedures so little advanced by comparison? >Why have to abduct so many people (if the numbers claimed have >any validity) to obtain sperm and ova samples? Seems to me if you >could beam an entire body up, you could simply beam up the sperm >without anyone being the wiser. Fact is, we seem further along the >artificial insemination and gene manipulation areas of technology >than the aliens allegedly are. It's rather as if we were to land men >on Mars while still trying to send signals back to Earth by >reflecting sunlight off mirrors. Obviously they need physical biological substances to create the hybrids, or they would just cobble up some computer code and "replicate" the substance in the microwave or something. There's a great deal about these experiences that also suggests that the interaction with humans is very much as important as the physical "exams" and the physical creation of the hybrids. I would remind you that this is clearly not an experiment, as we think of that process. These people know what they are doing and they are doing it on an *extremely large scale*. Therefore, I don't think they are "gathering samples." They are gathering genetic code/product, apparently for the purpose of creating a hybrid race. Why would they do that, gather such quantities/such diversity of "samples?" Well, you don't have to go very far in our literature to find a hint of this. Check out The Tower of Babel story. Something, and perhaps "the language" being referred to in that story was that of genetics, was scattered all over. There were then "many voices." I strongly suspect the Greys are reassembling those fragments into one cohesive code, one language. In a very real sense, I don't think they are creating a human-Grey hybrid race. They are creating a former human-Grey hybrid race, which might be something else altogether. I can't imagine how you assume that we are further along in genetic research and artificial insemination than the Greys are. Unless you know a lot more about the genetic work being done by the Greys than I do, and the difficulties therein (which I suspect are many), then you are hardly in a position to comment on it. >Don't make no sense, I say. That's why they call them aliens! ;-) Skye Turell <turel33@west.net>
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp