UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Oct > Oct 2

Ufosearch, ACC, Bell Labs and Roswell

From: Stuart & Toni Livesey <livesey@trump.net.au>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 08:53:36 +1000
Fwd Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 10:39:39 -0400
Subject: Ufosearch, ACC, Bell Labs and Roswell

G'day List,

I know that there are some people on the list who now
automatically hit the delete key as soon as they see a subject
that mentions ACC and that is unfortunate because this seems to
be one subject where members of the list have really worked at
investigating the subject. In the past many topics have
degenerated into slanging matches but this time the postings on
this subject, in the most part, have been objective.

Certainly the possibility of misinformation has been raised, and so it
should, we should take nothing at face value these days. As an aside it is
interesting to see that the debunkers have been fairly quiet - I wonder
what the implications of that are.

However, that is not what I want to raise now. What I want to do is take a
slightly different look at the ACC claims in the light of some suggestions
that Val Germann has made and also in the light of what we know happened
around Bell Labs site in the late 1940s and onwards. From there I want to
raise a question that has been bugging me since the ACC claims were raised.

Firstly, Ufosearch has suggested that Roswell could have been staged so
that it appeared as though alien technology just fell into the government's
hands rather than being passed to us as part of some sort of treaty. As Val
Germann points out, there is nothing concrete that we can point to that
would support this point of view but it certainly has a lot of
circumstantial evidence to support it.

Secondly ACC claims that our technology was seeded by aliens through the
Roswell incident and out of that seeding came the intergrated circuit and
all that flowed from it. Again there is nothing concrete to support that
suggestion but once again there is some circumstantial evidence that could
support it.

Thirdly there is the claim that this technology was passed to Bell Labs who
worked on it at their site in New Jersey, once again there is no direct
concrete evidence that this happened BUT ..... there is a bit of
information in the ACC claim that can and has been confirmed. ACC states
that the Bell Labs in the Watchung Mountains in New Jersey was defended by
anti-missile batteries. That is true although originally it was
anti-aircraft batteries that were situated around the Bell Labs site. What
did Bell Labs have that was worth the expense of such defenses? Did other
civilian sites have such defences?

Finally lets go back to Ufosearch, Val Germann suggests that one of the
reasons  it is possible that Roswell was staged is because no attempt was
made by the aliens to recover their technology. If we take into account
what has happened since Roswell then, on the balance of probabilities, this
suggestion carries a lot of weight.

So, to the question. If we assume all the above points as being factual
then what was the threat that the Government needed to defend Bell Labs
agains? Who were defences supposed to deter?

Stuart



Search for other documents from or mentioning: livesey

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com