UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Oct > Oct 2

Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

From: c549597@showme.missouri.edu [Barbara Becker]
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 13:17:18 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 09:50:05 -0400
Subject: Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

> To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> From: stenger@spindle.net [Sharolyn Stenger]
> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 1997 00:40:34 -0500

> >From: c549597@showme.missouri.edu [Barbara Becker]
> >Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 09:47:38 -0500
> >X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.02 (Win95; I)
> >To: ufo updates <updates@globalserve.net>
> >Subject: Re: One Picture is Worth a Thousand Words

> >What happened to my critics?  Steve, Don, Roger et al?  I thought we
> >were going to have a good discussion.  Do you not understand the
> >law?  Or does your silence indicate agreement?

> >BB

> I'm not Steve, Don or Roger, but I do have an opinion about the Gulf
> Breeze photographs.

> In the beginning of the Gulf Breeze flap it was reported that the "Ed"
> who photographed the craft did not want his identity known.  We've
> already had volumes of discussion here about witness anonymity.  I
> understood his reticence then and was certainly not surprised when
> Barbara reported that he may have submitted photos to the newspaper
> under assumed names.

When the Believer Bill photogrpah was submitted, Walters identitiy was
known.  All he had to say was , "Gee whiz folks, I took this photo with
my trusty Hot Shot, LOOK, it looks just like the ones I took with the
Colorpak.  Go figure."

> It would seem to me that the only people who would have a gripe or
> grounds for a suit against Ed would be Bob and Jane.  I don't care
> if the pictures carried the caption, "photographed by Little Lord
> Fauntleroy."  The miraculous thing here is the photographic evidence
> of something unexplained in the skies or hovering over the roads in
> Gulf Breeze, Florida!  Now, if you have some kind of proof that the
> photos taken by Ed, Bob, Dick, Jane, or Spot are fakes, trot it out.

1) Ed Walters copyrighted photographs allegedly taken by someone else.
That at the least would make him a thief.

2) Ed Walters copyrighted photographs taken by himself.
That at the least makes him a liar.

Pick one.


BB


Search for other documents from or mentioning: c549597 | stenger

[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com